This article was originally printed on the Keep Our St Helier Hospital website and is reproduced with thanks.
What is going on right now?
The latest assault on the NHS involves the imposition of a new contract for junior doctors that will see their salaries slashed by some 30 percent with a requirement for evening and Saturday work.
The excuse used to justify this change is to provide a seven-day service and improve patient outcomes on weekends.
The reality is that more qualified staff are being driven out in preparation for the deskilling that is always part of healthcare privatisation and corporate takeover. For the UK, this is mapped out in the Five Year Forward View by Simon Stevens, the head of NHS England. Stevens used to be an executive of the US-based private healthcare company, UnitedHealth.
What all junior doctors – and the rest of us – need to know
Many junior medics – which means all doctors not yet senior enough to work in consultant positions – have been stirred into action, but it is crucial for them to understand the context of their current predicament in order to mount an effective campaign to protect patients, restore decent treatment of staff and block the completion of the privatisation of the NHS.
But first, a little history lesson …
Conversion from the NHS model, a publicly-funded, -provided and universal system, to a private insurance model has been proposed for decades.
In 1968, Arthur Seldon, later Margaret Thatcher’s privatisation policy adviser, produced a pamphlet for the Institute of Economic Affairs called After the NHS, explaining the aspiration to “improve the NHS” by abolishing it so as to create profit opportunities for the insurance industry.
Further incarnations of this same plan to enable the insurance industry to increase its profits in the UK by destroying the NHS surfaced in the 1980s. This included Health of Nations by the Adam Smith Institute and, in 1988, Britains Biggest Enterprise: Ideas for Radical Reform of the NHS, a version articulated by current Conservative minister of state for government policy, Oliver Letwin MP in the NHS privatisation manifesto he wrote with John Redwood MP, which was published by the Centre for Policy Studies, a Thatcherite think-tank.
The stealth privatisation of the NHS had quietly begun under the Thatcher administration and has continued unabated ever since. The sole attempt to bring the plan out of the shadows – its presentation to a Conservative cabinet in 1983 – was so roundly rejected that the decision was taken to complete the privatisation by covert means, under a series of false narratives to distract the public from what was really going on.
These embraced outsourcing of non-clinical services, introduction of market bureaucracy, splitting up of the hospital network into independent Trusts and the usurious Private Finance Initiative (PFI) scheme for creating an opportunity to gouge the public purse through inflating the costs of funding new hospital building.
PFI started on John Major’s watch and continued under Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron.
Blair’s Labour government continued with the privatisation project, while maintaining the deceptions contained within successive pointless top-down reorganisations which actually took the NHS further down the privatisation road, precisely following the steps laid out in the Health of Nations NHS privatisation plan.
Why the hell didn’t we know about this?
Consecutive governments have diligently obscured the intent of health reforms with spin and misdirection, while senior NHS positions were often filled by those who would not be likely to point out these lies to their medical colleagues and the public.
The success of the project depended on public ignorance and distracting attention with myth creation. The propaganda agents include large sections of the media, in particular the BBC. Our public service broadcaster has avoided scrutinising health reforms and instead simply regurgitates government spin, peddles myths and presents pro-privatisation think-tanks as if they were independent.
Growing public and professional protest has been conveniently ignored. It is censorship by omission.
The British Medical Association (BMA) has spent the last two decades gently nodding through marketisation and privatisation under the guise of ‘critical engagement’. They have provided no effective challenge to government policy, and kept members in the dark to a degree that could suggest complicity at leadership level. Genuine opposition by BMA leaders to the Health and Social Care Act 2012 could have prevented the NHS being carved up for profiteers for example.
What state is the NHS in now?
The NHS has been fundamentally transformed in the last 20 years. Our nationally-integrated hospital network has been split up into distinct business units (‘foundation trusts’), which were deliberately burdened with PFI millstones that would throw them into insolvency as soon as a funding squeeze was applied to trigger this at the right time for privatisation.
Since 2013, health services have been funded through clinical commissioning groups (CCGs). These were designed by John Redwood MP to be self-collapsing, state-funded insurance pools. Though many CCG boards are fronted by GPs, the commissioning decisions they take are ultimately shaped by a set of rules that incentivise outsourcing to private healthcare companies with administrative support provided by yet more private companies.
CCG boards have great discretion over which services they will pay for and NHS-funded care will be increasingly restricted, damaging universal and comprehensive care. This will inevitably lead to patients paying charges for care, out of pocket, or through private top-up health insurance.
Or, to quote Letwin and Redwood on page 16 of Britain’s Biggest Enterprise: Ideas for Radical Reform of the NHS: “Another avenue which has been tentatively explored by the government is charging. In principle, this could be extended to the point of universality — a charge for every service.”
CCGs were designed as transitional bodies to be taken over by private insurers, accountancy firms and management consultants – an army of unnecessary intermediaries siphoning away taxpayers’ money from delivery of healthcare. GPs have been set up to be the scapegoats for the demise of the NHS.
Disempowerment, corruption and scapegoating of health professionals
To change the NHS from a health service to a business, the traditional medical leadership had to be replaced with a general management structure. Hospitals and health boards across the country had their small, clinically-dominated, patient-focused memberships replaced by a leadership that is less inclined and equipped to protest about damaging patient services and quality of care.
The introduction of the internal market, in which NHS services can be farmed out to the private sector, the setting of targets and the forcing of inflexible or unsuitable-for-hospitals ‘performance management’ standards led to an explosion in the number of administrators and managers required to implement these reforms.
Despite the public being sold a narrative about saving money, the changes have made the NHS more bureaucratic and expensive than ever – but none of that money is being spent on patient care.
The purchaser-provider divide-and-rule manoeuvre pits GPs against hospital doctors, handing GPs the axe to take to hospital services, contrary to the interests of patients – and in the face of opposition from hospital colleagues.
As a result, the line between the public and private sector in the NHS is blurred. The changes to the NHS have provided the infrastructure for siphoning money away from the delivery of care to patients and into the pockets of the profiteers.
This bloated administrative structure has imposed government policy irrespective of the outcome for patients, and it has been going on for a while now. The most infamous example of this was at Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust.
Priority was given to meeting financial performance targets to qualify for Foundation Trust status instead of ensuring adequate staff levels to run the hospital safely. Spinmeisters have carefully crafted messages to help officials and politicians redirect responsibility away from management and government policy failings.
Instead, hospital staff are blamed for lacking compassion or commitment.
A culture of fear and intimidation for those who dare speak out about preventable patient harm has been exposed repeatedly over recent years. The perpetrators escape sanction and many are promoted – in contrast to career destruction and psychological torment for the whistleblowers.
Public money is also wasted on cover-ups of malpractice linked to the privatising leadership clique in hospitals. Some whistleblowers are banned from coming into work, and this costs money. Dr Kim Holt told her superiors of the risks that later led to the death of Baby P, and their reaction was to send her home from work and hire locums to do her job – at a cost to the public purse of around £1m.
The incredible shrinking NHS
Clinical autonomy is now severely restricted due to lack of resources, so doctors may no longer be allowed to do what is right for patients because of bureaucratic restrictions introduced as part of the reshaping for privatisation.
The NHS has lost more than 50 percent of acute beds since 1979, leaving us with some of the most meagre hospital provision in Europe. The UK has just 2.8 beds per 1,000 population, compared to 6.3 and 8.3 for France and Germany respectively.
It is all a big false economy.
Doctors have to discharge patients prematurely to make space for sicker patients, but that can hamper recovery – or worse. Outpatient clinic appointments are also being cut, and the marketised system prevents patients being referred directly between specialists without first being sent back to their GPs, who have to make the referral.
These frustrating, inefficient, additional bureaucratic hurdles have been created to suit the marketised NHS, not patient nor doctor. The costs for administration for the NHS have increased from 5 percent of the total budget before the privatisation process started in the 1970s to 14 percent by 2005, amounting to more than £10bn per year additional cost without patient benefit. And the American system to which the government aspires was spending 31 percent on administration by 2003.
The cost of repayment of £11bn in PFI loans will exceed £80bn. Doctors agonise over patients being denied a bed or other essential care, whilst extortionate sums of money are squandered on market administration, outsourcing and PFI payments.
Betrayal of doctors and patients – by doctors
A significant minority of doctors have assisted in betraying the public and their colleagues. They are motivated by self-interest, realised through promotion, performance-related pay and bonuses. They have been busy downplaying and distracting from others’ concerns over privatisation; and this in turn is an attempt to make the BMA less effective at representing doctors.
When the complicit doctors collude with management and politicians in promoting hospital cuts and closures, patients’ lives are endangered.
We have doctors who are now paid advocates for the reconfigurations of NHS services expensively concocted by management consultants and accountancy firms, and these doctors’ glaring conflicts of interest largely go unmentioned.
In this environment of constant flux, confusion and stress, most NHS workers rarely delve into the detail of what is going on around them but remain preoccupied with dealing with the consequences. Apathy, ignorance, fear, disempowerment and a sense of futility combine to make a powerful disincentive to push back. Instead, NHS staff just keep their heads down and get on with the day (and night) job.
This is so far from the idealised vision most would have had of being a doctor in a civilised, open, accountable democracy. Working in the NHS has been transformed from feeling like part of a large family working for the common good to resembling a totalitarian state where survival is dependent on wilful blindness to all that fails our patients and colleagues. No wonder more than two-thirds of NHS employees are seriously considering leaving.
What does the future hold for the NHS?
The blueprint for the final stage of the NHS privatisation and conversion to a private insurance system is to be found in ex-UnitedHealth vice-president and current NHS England chief Simon Stevens’ Five Year Forward View.
Proposals that will profoundly alter the NHS in favour of his former employer have largely escaped public exposure and scrutiny.
Like many policy documents before it, the true intent is coded within harmless-sounding text. There is no mention of privatisation, competition, market or the growing role of commercial insurance in the NHS. Instead, we see code words like ‘innovation’, ‘choice’, ‘modernisation’, ‘integration’, ‘partnership’ and ‘prime contracting’.
The introduction claims a strong commitment to the NHS and then goes on to promote its carve-up. The proposals will replace the last vestiges of the NHS with ‘New Models of Care’ (NMC), which reformat the internal structure of the NHS. The reforms will make it less flexible, with more costly arrangements that better suit the commercial insurers destined to take over the system.
A further £20bn shortfall in funding is celebrated as ‘efficiency savings’. This masterpiece in spin and deception hides the reality of further hospital closures, GP surgery closures, staff reductions, pay cuts and reductions in qualified staff.
Patients’ medical needs will be met by non-existent community services. Access to non-profitable, competent, life-saving emergency care will be drastically reduced. The same con trick was pulled off with mental-health services under the ‘care in the community’ narrative in the 1990s. Publicly-owned psychiatric institutions were shut down and flogged off with insufficient replacement services to support patients.
Specialist hospital services are to be cut and concentrated in fewer larger centres. This, according to Stevens “could avoid the need for another 17,000 hospital beds – equivalent to opening 34 extra 500-bedded hospitals over the next five years.” (p36)
Or, put another way, NMC will enable the closure of another 34 district general hospitals: “More generally … NHS employers and staff and their representatives will need to consider how working patterns and pay and terms and conditions can best evolve to fully reward high performance, support jobs and service redesign …” (p31)
Some of the investment required for the NMC will come from the sale of NHS land and assets and, by 2020, the NMC could be put out to tender for international corporations to make ‘productive investment’ – ie, extract profit.
Junior doctors’ loss of income and increased hours performing routine work in previously defined unsocial hours will increase profitability for the new players, who will be providing health care by sweating the assets.
The ‘modern workforce’ created through the ‘Shape of Training Review’ for medical students and ‘Shape of Caring review’ for nurses, along with the creation of ‘transitional roles’, is designed to produce a cheaper and quicker-to-train, less-qualified workforce. We are told that they will be performing new roles ‘across organisational and sector boundaries’ – but this arguably means staff members doing things they aren’t qualified to do.
This represents a wholescale deskilling of the workforce, with nurses and physicians assistants doing doctors’ work, healthcare assistants (HCAs) doing nurses’ work and volunteers doing healthcare assistants’ work. No qualifications whatsoever are needed to enter an NHS hospital as a paid HCA, to do work formerly reserved for qualified nurses.
We are starting to be softened up for the ‘HealthForce’ of volunteers. We won’t even be paying the unskilled people we get to do nurses’ jobs! This is about to start becoming really dangerous for patients. And it is happening just as the monitoring of NHS performance is in the process of being privatised. This provides the essential cloak of commercial confidentiality and exemption from the Freedom of Information Act.
Private companies are not subject to FOI requests. Just one more reason to fear the march towards a fully-privatised health service.
What now for junior doctors?
The prospect of a 30 percent reduction in pay through the restriction of unsocial hours payments and an increased working week has been the prompt for protest and a potential spark for a brain drain, with thousands preparing documentation to emigrate.
Leaving the NHS for pastures new is an entirely justified response, but will do nothing to defend the NHS for the relatives and friends left behind who may need to rely on it for care. Those that leave now in the hope of coming back later when the dust has settled may find that the NHS has dwindled to a threadbare remnant in their absence, and the country will be a worse place for it.
We are collectively faced with one of the greatest political betrayals of the public interest in destroying the best healthcare system in the industrialised world and replacing it with a model resembling the worst.
Medics are highly trusted by the public and could prove a powerful voice against Stevens, Hunt and Letwin. NHS activists have been desperately hoping more medical leaders would join their ranks and help break the silence, thereby contributing to defending the NHS. No doubt the stakes are high, as serious consideration has to be given to personal and professional damage. Pressure may come from employers and unexpected quarters to stay in the shadows.
It is crucial to understand the scale of the privatisation industry and its broad influence over our politics and media, and the fact that they are now presiding over the discontinuation of the welfare state. They are well-funded and cunning, but they are lying.
We must educate ourselves and the wider public on the truth of the threat to the NHS if we are to mount a defence. The documentary Sell-Off gives a summary of what has happened in England. Michael Moore Sicko film exposes how the US system fails private healthcare insurance policy holders.
The privatisation project is well-planned and effective.
In Britain, it was essential to have Labour as a controlled opposition to then carry the privatisation baton between 1997 and 2010. Since back in opposition, Labour has provided tokenistic resistance and diverted genuine grassroots activism whilst simultaneously promoting the massive corporate power grab in the form of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).
What shall we do?
Junior doctors have overwhelming public support for industrial action, but they must be vigilant to avoid being impeded in their struggle by hidden traps.
With vast sums of money up for grabs, the privatisation lobby will stop at nothing to permanently and irreversibly break open the NHS for exploitation and profiteering at the expense of patients, staff and the taxpayer.
It is essential that techniques successfully deployed for decades by the US health insurance industry to neutralise attempts to improve health care for Americans – including the use of front groups, third-party advocates, think-tanks and other propaganda channels – are recognised and resisted, loudly and publicly.
Join or support local NHS campaigns and network with health activists to learn about the local issues and share your experience. Cross-fertilisation of knowledge is vital for maximising the impact of future activity.
Clear and simple messaging is important to influence the widest audience.
The treatment of junior doctors is inextricably linked to the privatisation agenda. Attempts to separate these issues will squander the opportunity to alert the public at large to the major heist that is under way. Advice to uncouple these issues should be rejected.
We must campaign for an end to privatisation and for the restoration of the NHS through renationalisation. We demand a publicly-funded and -provided, universal health service, and reinstatement of the secretary of state for health’s legal duty to provide a national health service – this duty was removed in the Health and Social Care Act 2012.
It will only be possible to protect patient care and improve terms and conditions for staff in a renationalised, publicly-run, not-for-profit system. Anything less will not escape corporate capture through the pending EU-US co-called trade deal – TTIP.
If you work for the NHS, speak out about what is going on in your workplace. There will be fewer career opportunities for doctors in the Five-Year Forward View’s deskilled NHS unless you are willing to work as a clerk, using computer packages rather than clinical judgement, providing medico-legal cover for your down-skilled colleagues.
Exposing the damage inflicted by frontline services cuts is powerful evidence against privatisation. Spread the word to your friends and family, and, if you work in the NHS, to your patients.
Use every available platform, from talking to people on the street to broadcast and social media. The greater the public awareness and understanding about what is happening to their health service, the harder the privatisation will become.
Pleading and petitioning of our politicians has failed to stop privatisation. There remain many already engaged in this approach. Both the Conservative Party and the Labour opposition support Stevens’ final solution for the NHS, the control of which currently remains in the firm grip of the corporate raiders.
Doctors, nurses, patients, campaigners and everyone they can get to join in must help build a mass movement to expose what is going on and fight for our NHS.
